<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WFRP 3e? Really? Oh dear.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mostlygeek.sucanty.com/2009/07/wfrp-3e-really-oh-dear/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mostlygeek.sucanty.com/2009/07/wfrp-3e-really-oh-dear/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 07:34:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://mostlygeek.sucanty.com/2009/07/wfrp-3e-really-oh-dear/comment-page-1/#comment-435</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 15:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mostlygeek.sucanty.com/?p=763#comment-435</guid>
		<description>Given I haven&#039;t played it I&#039;m not going to say what it is or isn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given I haven&#8217;t played it I&#8217;m not going to say what it is or isn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Llamamman</title>
		<link>http://mostlygeek.sucanty.com/2009/07/wfrp-3e-really-oh-dear/comment-page-1/#comment-428</link>
		<dc:creator>Llamamman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 03:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mostlygeek.sucanty.com/?p=763#comment-428</guid>
		<description>I have played WFRP since the first edition. This is NOT WFRP. This IS crap. Making money is not the measure of a good game folks. Lots of simple people like shiny colorful objects. I am just sad that the real WFRP will no longer be supported. I sad day indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have played WFRP since the first edition. This is NOT WFRP. This IS crap. Making money is not the measure of a good game folks. Lots of simple people like shiny colorful objects. I am just sad that the real WFRP will no longer be supported. I sad day indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: So &#8230; WFRP 3e &#124; Mostly Geek</title>
		<link>http://mostlygeek.sucanty.com/2009/07/wfrp-3e-really-oh-dear/comment-page-1/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>So &#8230; WFRP 3e &#124; Mostly Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 01:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mostlygeek.sucanty.com/?p=763#comment-237</guid>
		<description>[...] new edition of Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay was announced at Gen Con this week, as we expected it would be. It&#8217;s looking pretty different. There&#8217;s a summary of the known facts here, but in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] new edition of Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay was announced at Gen Con this week, as we expected it would be. It&#8217;s looking pretty different. There&#8217;s a summary of the known facts here, but in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stargazer&#39;s World &#187; Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay! WTF?</title>
		<link>http://mostlygeek.sucanty.com/2009/07/wfrp-3e-really-oh-dear/comment-page-1/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>Stargazer&#39;s World &#187; Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay! WTF?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 11:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mostlygeek.sucanty.com/?p=763#comment-231</guid>
		<description>[...] when I first heard about the 3rd edition Fantasy Flight Games is about to release, I thought it was a hoax. But alas it was not. Graham [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] when I first heard about the 3rd edition Fantasy Flight Games is about to release, I thought it was a hoax. But alas it was not. Graham [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asmodai</title>
		<link>http://mostlygeek.sucanty.com/2009/07/wfrp-3e-really-oh-dear/comment-page-1/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>Asmodai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 05:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mostlygeek.sucanty.com/?p=763#comment-211</guid>
		<description>Huh, while it is hard to argue the business sense of this since if DnD 4e is really doing well then there is no reason for them not to cash in on free money..... still a bloody shame though lobotomizing the system and removing any character deep.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh, while it is hard to argue the business sense of this since if DnD 4e is really doing well then there is no reason for them not to cash in on free money&#8230;.. still a bloody shame though lobotomizing the system and removing any character deep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lordmalachdrim</title>
		<link>http://mostlygeek.sucanty.com/2009/07/wfrp-3e-really-oh-dear/comment-page-1/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>lordmalachdrim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mostlygeek.sucanty.com/?p=763#comment-198</guid>
		<description>If true it just means I have more time available for HackMaster</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If true it just means I have more time available for HackMaster</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andreas Davour</title>
		<link>http://mostlygeek.sucanty.com/2009/07/wfrp-3e-really-oh-dear/comment-page-1/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Andreas Davour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 02:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mostlygeek.sucanty.com/?p=763#comment-186</guid>
		<description>For those who doubt 4th ed. is selling well I think this nails it down pretty well. When someone is copying your concept it&#039;s usually not because it&#039;s a business failure. 

I have my 1st ed WHFRP GW rulebook. Works just fine, and has naked dwarves and all. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those who doubt 4th ed. is selling well I think this nails it down pretty well. When someone is copying your concept it&#8217;s usually not because it&#8217;s a business failure. </p>
<p>I have my 1st ed WHFRP GW rulebook. Works just fine, and has naked dwarves and all. <img src='http://mostlygeek.sucanty.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kaeosdad</title>
		<link>http://mostlygeek.sucanty.com/2009/07/wfrp-3e-really-oh-dear/comment-page-1/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>kaeosdad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mostlygeek.sucanty.com/?p=763#comment-185</guid>
		<description>well, I&#039;ll be the first to say it. Fuck yea! I also enjoyed wfrp, but this sounds very exciting. If its a combo of dnd4e and wfrp, but with dice pools I&#039;m all in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, I&#8217;ll be the first to say it. Fuck yea! I also enjoyed wfrp, but this sounds very exciting. If its a combo of dnd4e and wfrp, but with dice pools I&#8217;m all in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stargazer</title>
		<link>http://mostlygeek.sucanty.com/2009/07/wfrp-3e-really-oh-dear/comment-page-1/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Stargazer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 06:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mostlygeek.sucanty.com/?p=763#comment-184</guid>
		<description>That sounds pretty bad. It&#039;s seems FFG is totally out of its mind. And I don&#039;t know what they want to accomplish by turning WFRP into a second D&amp;D 4E. It&#039;s a shame, WFRP was one of my favorite RPGs. *sigh*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That sounds pretty bad. It&#8217;s seems FFG is totally out of its mind. And I don&#8217;t know what they want to accomplish by turning WFRP into a second D&amp;D 4E. It&#8217;s a shame, WFRP was one of my favorite RPGs. *sigh*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

